It is released and usable
Anyone can sign up and use it today. A waitlist, a demo video or a landing page with an email capture on it is not yet a product we can describe.
List your AI marketing tool on a directory of 195 entries. Send the form once: a person reads every submission and replies by email within 24 hours.
Fill in the tool and press Submit. AI Auto-fill can draft most of the form from your own website.
One step, about five minutesSubmitting a tool takes a couple of minutes. The review that follows is the same one every entry on the list goes through, whether we found it or you sent it in.
Any AI software a marketing team would pay for, including generative AI tools for writing, images and video. Every entry is filed under the marketing job it does, so the quickest way to know whether yours fits is to find its job below:
If your tool does a marketing job that is not on this list, submit it anyway and say which job it does. If it is not built for marketers at all, it is likely to be declined, and we will tell you so.
Reading these before you send the form is the fastest way to know whether it is worth your time.
Anyone can sign up and use it today. A waitlist, a demo video or a landing page with an email capture on it is not yet a product we can describe.
The tool does something a working marketing team would pay for: content, search, ads, social, lifecycle, analytics, creative, or the operations around them.
A public pricing page, or plan limits stated somewhere we can link to. "Contact us for pricing" on its own leaves nothing to record in the entry.
Feature and limit claims trace back to documentation, a changelog or the pricing page. We cite sources on every entry, so anything we cannot source does not go in.
The last question on the form asks how you would like to launch. It changes what we write back to you: which options we send, and how soon. It does not change the entry.
Everything on a page here is written from the vendor's own pricing page, documentation and changelog, and it says what those sources say. No option buys a position either: the list runs newest first, which is the date an entry joined rather than a judgement about it, and nothing on this site is scored or ranked. Entries are not sent to vendors for approval.
The same rules are set out in the editorial policy and how we compile this list, which apply to every submission alike.
This site is a compilation rather than a review board. There are no scores, no verdicts and no ranked order, so a submission is not a competition you either win or lose. It is a pointer at a tool we might not have found, and what happens next is research.
The answers you send tell us where to look. The entry itself is written from the pricing page, the documentation, the changelog and whatever independent coverage exists, because those are the things a reader can check for themselves. That is also why an entry sometimes records a limit or a caveat the submission did not mention: we describe the product as published, not as pitched.
Where something is unclear, we ask rather than guess. A short reply with a link to the right documentation page usually settles it.
The readers here are marketers researching software they are about to pay for. A tool can be genuinely good and still be wrong for this list: developer tooling, consumer apps and general business software all get turned down regularly. If yours is one of those, we say so plainly rather than leave the submission sitting unanswered.
The other common decline is timing. Products that have not shipped yet cannot be described accurately, and an entry written from a landing page ages badly the moment the real thing launches. Send it again once it is out.
Yes. Submitting costs nothing and there is nothing to verify first. Fill in the form once and it comes straight to us. The launch question at the end tells us whether you also want to hear about a faster launch, or would rather swap a badge or link for the listing.
Fill in the form at the top of this page: the tool, its website, the marketing job it does, the problem it solves, how a marketing team uses it, and an email we can reply to. A person reads it and emails you within 24 hours. If it fits, the entry is written from the vendor own published pages and you get the live link by email.
It tells us what you would like to hear about: fast-track options, details of a launch across AI Tools for Marketers, zPlatform.ai and LaunchRounds, a badge or blog link in exchange for a free listing, or the standard editorial queue. It changes what we write back, never what the entry says: this site compiles rather than ranks.
No. The form sends as soon as you press Submit. After that, the confirmation shows the badge code, and adding it is optional. If you do, reply to our email with the live URL of the page it is on.
No. This list is not ranked: entries are shown newest first, which is a date rather than a judgement, and nothing on this site is scored. No option on the form buys a position, a verdict or the wording of an entry.
Yes, as long as marketers are the people using it. Generative AI tools for copy, images, video and ad creative make up a large part of the list. A general-purpose generator with no marketing use case is usually declined.
The marketing job the tool does, the problem it solves in a marketing team words, how a team actually uses it day to day, the marketing jobs it supports and what it replaces. Those answers are what the entry is filed under, so they are required rather than optional.
Yes. Send the form once for each tool, so each submission gets its own review and its own reply. Separate plans or editions of the same product only need one submission.
No. There is no account, login or vendor dashboard. You submit through the form on this page, and the review, the reply and any later corrections all happen by email.
No. It is a directory: each tool is described from its published sources and linked, but nothing is bought or sold through the site. Submitting works the way it would on a marketplace in one respect only: you send the tool in, and it is reviewed before anything appears.
You hear from us by email within 24 hours with where your submission stands. If it is selected for the standard editorial queue, the entry itself usually follows in two to three weeks. Either way you get a reply, including when the answer is no, so you are not left waiting on a queue that never moves.
No. Most submissions that get turned down are turned down for one of two reasons: the tool has not shipped yet, or the audience is not a marketer. Developer tooling, consumer apps and general business software get declined here even when they are good, because the readers of this site are researching marketing software.
Each listing records what the tool does, its documented capabilities and limits, who it suits and who it does not, what it costs once usage and add-ons are counted, the marketing jobs it supports and what it stands in for, and a source for every pricing and limit claim.
No. Entries are not sent to vendors for sign-off, because an entry a vendor has approved is advertising rather than a compilation. If something in a published entry is factually wrong, tell us and it is corrected the same day.
The entry links to your tool, and that link carries rel="nofollow", as every outbound link on this site does. What a listing gives you is a dated, independently written entry that marketers find when they are comparing tools for a job.
Send the change to [email protected] with a source we can check. Pricing changes, renamed plans and discontinued products are all worth flagging, and the entry is updated with a fresh verification date.
Prefer email? [email protected]