It is released and usable
Anyone can sign up and use it today. A waitlist, a demo video or a landing page with an email capture on it is not yet a product we can describe.
Tell us what the tool does and who it is for. Every submission is read by a person, and anything that fits the list is checked against published sources before an entry is written.
Use the form below to submit a tool for the list. We reply within two working days, whether or not it is a fit.
Reading these before you send the form is the fastest way to know whether it is worth your time.
Anyone can sign up and use it today. A waitlist, a demo video or a landing page with an email capture on it is not yet a product we can describe.
The tool does something a working marketing team would pay for: writing, SEO, ads, design, video, automation, analytics, or the operations around them.
A public pricing page, or plan limits stated somewhere we can link to. "Contact us for pricing" on its own leaves nothing to record in the entry.
Feature and limit claims trace back to documentation, a changelog or the pricing page. We cite sources on every entry, so anything we cannot source does not go in.
This site is a compilation rather than a review board. There are no scores, no verdicts and no ranked order, so a submission is not a competition you either win or lose. It is a pointer at a tool we might not have found, and what happens next is research.
The description you send tells us where to look. The entry itself is written from the pricing page, the documentation, the changelog and whatever independent coverage exists, because those are the things a reader can check for themselves. That is also why an entry sometimes records a limit or a caveat the submission did not mention: we describe the product as published, not as pitched.
Where something is unclear, we ask rather than guess. A short reply with a link to the right documentation page usually settles it.
The readers here are marketers researching software they are about to pay for. A tool can be genuinely good and still be wrong for this list: developer tooling, consumer apps and general business software all get turned down regularly. If yours is one of those, we say so plainly rather than leave the submission sitting unanswered.
The other common decline is timing. Products that have not shipped yet cannot be described accurately, and an entry written from a landing page ages badly the moment the real thing launches. Send it again once it is out.
We do not send drafts to vendors for sign-off, and being listed does not come with editorial input into what the entry says. What it does come with is a correction route: if a published entry gets a fact wrong, email it over with a source and it is fixed the same day, with the verification date updated on the page. The full standard is set out in how we compile this list and the editorial policy.
Questions that are not a submission belong on the contact page. If you have an article rather than a tool, write for us is the right route.
We run three other directories alongside this one. Each takes its own submissions and reviews on its own schedule, so if your tool fits one of them better than it fits this list, go straight there.
A discovery board for AI tools, across writing, SEO, automation, agents, design and coding. Ranking comes from coverage earned and community votes, never from payment.
Independent software profiles and comparisons for buyers and operators. It takes SaaS and desktop software as well as AI tools, so it fits products that are not AI-first.
A directory of SaaS affiliate and partner programs, read by people looking for something to promote. Worth a submission only if your tool runs a public affiliate or referral program.
Submissions are read by a person, usually within two working days. You get a reply either way, including when the answer is no, so you are not left waiting on a queue that never moves.
AI writing and SEO tools, image and video generators, ad and creative platforms, chatbots, automation and workflow software, analytics and attribution tools, and the operational software a marketing team runs on. The tool needs to be usable today and have pricing published somewhere we can link to.
No. Most submissions that get turned down are turned down for one of two reasons: the tool has not shipped yet, or the audience is not a marketer. Developer tooling, consumer apps and general business software get declined here even when they are good, because the readers of this site are researching marketing software.
We read it, then research the tool the same way we research anything else on the list: the pricing page, the documentation, the changelog, and whatever independent coverage exists. The entry is written from those sources rather than from the description you send, which is there to point us at the right things.
No. Entries are not sent to vendors for sign-off, because an entry a vendor has approved is advertising rather than a compilation. If something in a published entry is factually wrong, tell us and it is corrected the same day.
Send the change to [email protected] with a source we can check. Pricing changes, renamed plans and discontinued products are all worth flagging, and the entry is updated with a fresh verification date.