Research tools claim to shorten the distance between a question and an answer. AI helps most with reading: summarising thousands of reviews, coding open-ended survey answers, watching competitor pages and turning findings into a brief. It helps least when the thing missing is data.
That makes provenance the first question for every entry here. A finding built on a survey panel, a set of reviews or a rival’s public pages can be checked. A finding generated from a model’s general knowledge cannot, and a tool that mixes the two without saying so produces confident slides with nothing underneath them.
Competitive intelligence adds a timing question. A change to a rival’s pricing or positioning matters when you hear about it, and entries here record what the vendor says about detection speed and what the plan caps.
Where an entry covers generated personas or simulated respondents, it says so. They are useful for drafting questions and testing wording, and they are not evidence about customers.